ITRS Analytics deployment planning and resiliency

This guide helps you understand the resiliency characteristics and trade-offs of different ITRS Analytics deployment options. Your choice of deployment model directly affects high availability, continuous operations, and your ability to meet uptime and compliance requirements.

Designing a resilient ITRS Analytics deployment Copied

ITRS Analytics is built on a Kubernetes-native architecture, designed for continuous high availability, scalable deployments, and resilient operations. A key decision that drives most resiliency characteristics is the choice of deployment model: Bring Your Own Cluster (BYOC) or Embedded Cluster (EC).

BYOC is the recommended deployment model, offering customers maximum flexibility, control, and enterprise-grade resiliency. Embedded Cluster can be suitable for small-scale or trial deployments, but it comes with specific trade-offs and limitations. This guide explains the implications of choosing an Embedded Cluster, rather than treating BYOC and EC as equivalent options.

ITRS Analytics achieves resiliency through high availability and continuous operations mechanisms. By running redundant services across the cluster with intelligent load balancing and automated failover, the platform ensures uninterrupted access to observability data even during component or node failures.

With a Kubernetes-native design, monitoring and alerting workflows continue seamlessly, meeting strict compliance and uptime requirements without requiring manual intervention. Understanding these characteristics and how they differ between BYOC and EC is essential for designing a deployment that aligns with your organization’s uptime, compliance, and continuous operations goals.

Key resiliency concepts Copied

When planning your ITRS Analytics deployment, two fundamental concepts work together to define the platform’s operational characteristics.

High availability (HA) Copied

High availability ensures that your observability platform continues to operate without interruption, even if individual components fail. This is achieved by deploying redundant services, load balancers, and failover mechanisms so that if one instance becomes unavailable, another seamlessly takes over.

Key characteristics:

Note

While HA configurations can deploy across multiple availability zones within a region, all nodes must maintain network latency below 10ms to ensure proper cluster operation.

Continuous operations Copied

ITRS Analytics is designed to maintain continuous operations during localized failures within a single cluster. Through high availability configurations, the platform automatically handles pod failures, node outages, and individual service disruptions without manual intervention. Kubernetes orchestration ensures workloads are rescheduled, traffic is rerouted, and services remain accessible even as infrastructure components fail and recover.

This continuous operations model focuses on keeping the platform available within a single site or region during common failure scenarios—precisely the situations where your observability data is most critical for troubleshooting and incident response.

Important

ITRS Analytics does not provide built-in cross-site or cross-region disaster recovery capabilities. The platform is designed for continuous operations during localized failures (pods, nodes, services) within a single deployment, not for automatic failover between geographically separated instances.

Requirements for disaster recovery across regions or data centers Copied

If your organization requires protection against large-scale or catastrophic events, such as complete data center outages, regional cloud failures, or severe cyber incidents, you must implement your own disaster recovery strategy by:

This approach allows you to design disaster recovery that aligns with your specific Recovery Time Objectives (RTO) and Recovery Point Objectives (RPO), while the platform itself focuses on maximizing uptime within each deployment.

Kubernetes deployment methods Copied

ITRS Analytics supports two primary methods for deploying into a Kubernetes platform. Your choice impacts the resiliency features available to you.

Bring Your Own Cluster (BYOC) Copied

In this scenario, customers have a dedicated team or expertise to deploy standard Kubernetes services from a hyperscaler or an on-premises system. This is the recommended approach for production deployments.

Native Bring Your Own Cluster (BYOC) environments typically offer broader capabilities and operational advantages compared to the Embedded Cluster deployment model.

Embedded Cluster (EC) Copied

This scenario is for customers who don’t have access to a Kubernetes platform and want ITRS to deploy the Embedded Cluster (packaged K0s) with ITRS Analytics.

Advantages of native BYOC deployments Copied

Native Bring Your Own Cluster (BYOC) environments provide several operational advantages over Embedded Cluster (EC) deployments. The scenarios below illustrate how these advantages play out in real-world ITRS Analytics operations.

Ensuring resilient access with load balancers Copied

Scenario: Your organization runs multiple ITRS Analytics ingestion services and UIs that must remain accessible even during high traffic spikes.

In a BYOC environment, Kubernetes load balancers automatically distribute traffic across multiple replicas of your services. They also integrate with DNS registries, keeping URLs and endpoints resilient during network changes.

In contrast, Embedded Cluster deployments do not include a built-in load balancer. As a result, additional coordination with a network team is required to ensure resilient access to ITRS Analytics services.

Why it matters for ITRS Analytics:

Scaling storage dynamically with decoupled storage classes Copied

Scenario: Your ClickHouse workload grows steadily from 500GB to several terabytes of data over time.

With BYOC, storage is decoupled from individual nodes. Kubernetes ensures that persistent volumes follow the workload as pods are rescheduled, and extendable storage classes allow volumes to grow seamlessly as data increases.

Embedded Cluster deployments, however, rely solely on local node storage. If a node becomes unavailable, the associated workloads cannot be rescheduled elsewhere, causing the system to run in a degraded state until the original node is restored.

Why it matters for ITRS Analytics:

Deploying secure workloads on tuned platforms Copied

Scenario: Your IT security team enforces strict policies and container security requirements for all workloads.

In a BYOC cluster, security policies are designed for Kubernetes, allowing containers to start and access resources as intended. Misconfigurations or access issues are easier to diagnose because the environment is Kubernetes-native.

Running an Embedded Cluster on servers that are secured with tools designed for traditional workloads can cause friction. Security agents may block EC installation steps, container operations, or access to required system resources.

Why it matters for ITRS Analytics:

Streamlined support across teams Copied

Scenario: Your organization has separate teams for infrastructure, platform, and application operations.

In a BYOC setup, responsibilities are clearly divided: infrastructure teams manage nodes, platform teams administer Kubernetes, and application teams deploy and manage ITRS Analytics. Issues can be addressed at the appropriate layer without always escalating to ITRS.

The Embedded Cluster model hides Kubernetes from the application team, meaning any issue that surfaces within the cluster must be escalated to ITRS Support. This can slow down triage and restrict internal teams from participating in platform-level support.

Why it matters for ITRS Analytics:

Maintaining High Availability with Pod Management Copied

Scenario: A critical ClickHouse node fails during a server maintenance window.

In a BYOC environment with decoupled storage, Kubernetes can reschedule stateful pods on available nodes, keeping services running with minimal downtime.

In Embedded Cluster deployments, storage is tied to the physical node. If a node running a stateful set becomes unavailable, Kubernetes cannot reschedule the workload. It must wait for the node to return, resulting in degraded system performance.

Why it matters for ITRS Analytics:

Deployment scenarios Copied

The following sections describe various deployment scenarios, each with specific benefits and trade-offs. Understanding these helps you select the right configuration for your requirements.

Non-HA single or multi-node (BYOC) Copied

This configuration is suitable for proof-of-concept deployments and smaller production environments where high availability is not a strict requirement.

Common use cases:

Characteristics:

Note

Proof-of-concept deployments come with no guarantee of highly available data due to their exploratory nature.

Non-HA single or multi-node (Embedded Cluster) Copied

Similar to the BYOC non-HA configuration, but deployed on-premises using Embedded Cluster. This option has additional limitations around data protection.

Common use cases:

Important considerations:

Warning

Since backup and restore is not supported with Embedded Cluster, organizations should carefully assess their data protection requirements before choosing this deployment method.

Making your deployment decision Copied

Choosing the right deployment model for ITRS Analytics is fundamental to achieving the resiliency and operational characteristics your organization needs.

Key takeaways:

Start by evaluating whether you have access to a Kubernetes platform or team. If yes, BYOC is your path forward. If not, understand the Embedded Cluster trade-offs before proceeding, particularly around data protection and operational flexibility.

For detailed resource requirements and sizing guidance, see ITRS Analytics Sizer.

["ITRS Analytics"] ["User Guide", "Technical Reference"]

Was this topic helpful?